While Games such as second life and the sims don't have much to do with my major, I do acknowledge the importance of getting youth to learn in many different ways. For my major I'm going to have to learn a lot about television, and broadcasting, and it may be helpful if there was some kind of game to virtually learn those things. I remember in high school in AP bio we used a computer program my teacher created to virtually dissect animals that we would not have the opportunity to do otherwise. It also had quizzes scattered throughout so we really learned the material. The group with the most points for correct answers won prizes or extra credit points on their test. I think creating games such as this would be very beneficial to a wide variety of subjects, and with the continuous advancements it shouldn't be too hard to keep them entertaining.
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
Gaming Education
Recently in class we learned about the use of games as a learning tool. With the extensive technologies it is now possible to do more than ever before on the internet. We have learned that cloud computing, open source software, and social networking and media have all been recent additions to the teaching curriculum for younger students. It really amazes me how much technology has advanced since I was a kid. I remember when the first sims game came out (sim city) and roller coaster tycoon. That was just the beginning of interactive online games that taught users how to budget, earn money, and take care of "living" people. Now the sims games are more interactive, and the graphics are insane. Not only that but we learned about Second Life, which is like a more interactive version of the sims, that people actually invest real money in and can even make a profit. I was shocked to learn that there have been real law suits regarding money and copy rights in the video world of second life, it is instances like this that the legal issues and ethical lines become blurred.
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
Distance Education
A couple of weeks ago in class we learned about distance education and its increasing popularity. As our society continues to become more and more centered around technology, it seems logical that getting a degree online would be possible. Many highly acclaimed universities now have distance learning available, which has been quite the controversy recently. First, if someone is taking classes online at UF but never sets foot on campus, can they call themselves a Gator? Or if they get their education from Phoenix online, and are competing for the same job with the same major as you, should they be set to a lower standard? There are pros and cons to online education, but first the pros. Being able to take classes online is very convenient for those who have weird schedules. If you have class online you don't need to be in a classroom at the same time every day, and can do the work (by the deadline of course) at your own pace. In addition, it teaches responsibility and time management, because It would be easy to put things off or forget to do them if you didnt have to go to class every day to get reminded. Alternately, people argue that it is lazy, and that its a lot easier.
There are some very prestigious schools that offer online classes, but there are also a lot of scams out there. There are websites that you can pay to get a fake degree. In class we learned about a dog who got an online degree. If you are taking only classes online it is very important to make sure it is legitimate. I think for the most part online classes are a great thing. Sometimes if you need a class, but the only openings are online you have to wait to take it another semester, but with the addition of distance education, it can be taken online which can be very helpful and save a lot of time!
Professional Web Presence
Recently in class we learned about, and created our own personal Professional Web Presence websites. With the advancement of internet, and our dependence on it, has created many positive opportunities, as well as some that can be detrimental. As discussed in previous blog entries facebook and other social networking websites can often portray people in a negative way. For example, if a future potential employer were to google your name and the only information they could find about you was on facebook, would that be a negative or a positive for you? Odds are it would be inaccurate at the very least. Creating your own web presence is a great opportunity to share information about yourself that reflects your positive assets.
My web presence was really easy to make, and there was a lot of flexibility and room for individual creativity. We used sites.google.com for this particular assignment, and was easy and helpful just as all other google applications are. There were a few times when I couldn't figure out how to do something, so I entered my question and it was immediately answered.
Having your own web presence is very important to any person particularly in my generation. It is almost like an online resume except it can be more personal. For example, on mine I added a section where I was able to give some background information, explain my interests, etc. I also had a section like a resume, and another section where I was able to display some of the work I had done in this class. The best part about having my own web presence, is I can update it whenever I want to/need to, so as I continue to grow and become more experienced, I can display that in my site.
Thursday, April 8, 2010
Concept mapping with Webspiration.com!
Tuesday, April 6, 2010
Web Technology
There is no question that we live in a technology obsessed society. But how can people keep up with all the new advancements of the internet and web 2.0? It has become possible to do almost everything from your computer. It is now possible to live without ever leaving your home. Groceries can be ordered and delivered to your home, you can work many jobs, even live alternate lives with the use of interactive video games and avatars. I found a pretty useful video to help people get up with the web 2.0 lingo, it made me laugh a few times (Although I don't think it is meant to be funny)
In its 40 year existence, internet it has changed dramatically. As I mentioned earlier is has become possible for people to do virtually anything from the comfort of their homes from just using their computers. People often argue that there is too high of a dependency on internet, that it can be detrimental to people, particularly children. It is said that children who are too involved in the internet often have self esteem issues, or get a skewed view of reality. In addition to this, in class we were introduced to cyber bullying and were made aware of how easy it can be for children to get involved with a cyber pedophile without recognizing it. Alternately, it can be argued that the use of the internet as an educational tool can be very beneficial when monitored correctly.
Web 2.0 has opened many doors for anyone with access to internet, and it is mind blowing to think about what we could be capable of doing in another 40 years. In my opinion it has been more of a blessing than a curse.
Educational Technology
I
wanted to start this post with that video I found on youtube.com that
if you ask me sums up the significance of the ever changing
technological world we live in. In just a century we have gone from
virtually no technology to a society dependent upon it. As the video
points out that the only thing constant about technology is that its
ever changing.When I first decided to enter the college of journalism and communications,
I didn't understand how important it was to have a wide understanding
of computers and technology. I know for my major of telecommunications
I'm going to have to be constantly learning new devices, and how to use
them. At first I wanted to focus on communications, but looking back I
realize a field that in the past may not have required a wide
understanding needs one now.Hopefully I will be able to keep up! The thing that blows my mind is that kids
younger than me might be more technologically with it then I am,
because technology is now being taught and used at a much earlier age
to maximize learning.
wanted to start this post with that video I found on youtube.com that
if you ask me sums up the significance of the ever changing
technological world we live in. In just a century we have gone from
virtually no technology to a society dependent upon it. As the video
points out that the only thing constant about technology is that its
ever changing.When I first decided to enter the college of journalism and communications,
I didn't understand how important it was to have a wide understanding
of computers and technology. I know for my major of telecommunications
I'm going to have to be constantly learning new devices, and how to use
them. At first I wanted to focus on communications, but looking back I
realize a field that in the past may not have required a wide
understanding needs one now.Hopefully I will be able to keep up! The thing that blows my mind is that kids
younger than me might be more technologically with it then I am,
because technology is now being taught and used at a much earlier age
to maximize learning.
Copyrights
Copyrighting material is extremely important. Ever since we were kids we have been drilled by our teachers in our writing and english classes to attribute our borrowed information to the person who stated it. Without copyrights anyone could go out and sing a Michael Jackson song for instance, and claim that it is theirs. Copyright laws have made it easier for people to protect their work, but at the same time it has become a concern. With the advancement of internet and other technology information is easier to access than ever, and once something is posted on the internet is remains there indefinitely. This can be very helpful when looking for resources, but it also gives abundant access for people to take the ideas of other people.
The issue of copyrighting is one that is particularly important in my field of studies. Plagiarizing in the field of journalism is an ever increasing offense. For instance Jayson Blair made it very apparent that it happens even at one of the most prestigious newspapers in the country. To make this worse, there is even evidence that he had plagiarized for all four years he had written for The New York Times. (http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/11/national/11PAPE.html?pagewanted=1) This is much worse of a problem because it diminishes public trust in journalists particularly when in happens within a respected newspaper.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)